Clark vs Kozman debate
Can technology change the way we learn? Well according to Richard
E. Clark in his 1983 argument he states that technology can only be a medium to
deliver information but it is not what will make us learn something new. He
stated like this “just like the truck is used to deliver goods to a store has
no influence on the groceries it carries. The media is only a vehicle by which
it is delivered. He adds by stating “learning
comes from the instructional method.” He concluded that media does not have any
influence on learning what so ever.
Richard Kozman in 1991 combat Clark's theory by stating that using
different media can complement the teacher in her quest to teach any subject effectively.
Kozman believse that technology provide a unique experience to
learning. He continues in his statement that “we should look at the attributes of the specific
medium rather than the specific medium itself.” Really Clark’s conclusion comes from research
done fifty years ago.
There have not been any studies that prove either one to be
right. Technology of today has changed drastically in just the last ten years. The
computers that were used then were all big and complicated. The technology then was
still simple in design and not much educational benefit but in a developmental stage. Today
we have games for teaching a concept, YouTube for explaining or
elaborating on a fact, google for research, and an IPad with different apps that can compliment a teacher’s lesson. A child of today is enriched with different ways
for learning at any given subject using technology. But of course it is not the
only means by which they can learn. It is a known fact that media does not work
for everybody but for some. “Instructional technology only works for some kids, with some topics, and under some conditions – but that is true of all pedagogy. There is nothing that works for every purpose, for every learner, and all the time.” (Mann, 2001) Technology does provide a different avenue from that
traditional way of paper and pencil into a world of
entertainment and maybe go as far as to say they encouraged a student to
learn. Of course there may be some hiccups for those students
that are economically disadvantage that don’t have a computer or an IPad in
their home. They have more obstacles to overcome by not being
exposed to the privileges that others financially secure families have.
Coming down to the fact is that technology, in and of
itself, can neither make a child to learn nor deplete instruction but enhance a
good teacher’s instruction. A good teacher is a good teacher and that is what
the child needs most importantly.
Technology are only the tools that teacher can utilize to motivate the today's child to learn.
Technology are only the tools that teacher can utilize to motivate the today's child to learn.
Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology
Research and
Development, 42 (1), 21-29.
Clark, R. E. (2007). Learning from Serious Games?Arguments,
Evidence, and
Research Suggestions. EDUCATIONAL
TECHNOLOGY, May-June 2007, 56-59.
Gredler, M. E. (1996). Educational games and simulations: A technology
in search of a
researchparadigm.
In D. H. Jonassen
(Ed.), Handbook of research on
educational communications
and technology (pp. 521–540).
New York: Simon &
SchusterMacmillan Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with Media.
Review of Educational
Research, 61 (2), 179-211.
Kozma, R. B. (1994). The Influence of Media on Learning: The
Debate
Continues. School Library Media Research SLMQ 22 (4).
Mann, D. (2001). Documenting the Effects of Instructional
Technology, A Fly-Over of Policy Questions.
In W. F. Heineke
& L. Blasi (Eds.), Research methods for educational technology ;
v. 1: Methods of evaluating
educational technology (Vol. 1, pp. 239-249).Greenwich, Conn.: Information Age
Pub
No comments:
Post a Comment